<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Sunshine Coast Solar Centre</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.suncoastsolar.com.au/index.php/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.suncoastsolar.com.au</link>
	<description>The Sun Works</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 22 Feb 2012 01:41:56 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>Solar Panels &#8211; What&#8217;s in a name?</title>
		<link>http://www.suncoastsolar.com.au/index.php/2012/02/15/solar-panels-whats-in-a-name/</link>
		<comments>http://www.suncoastsolar.com.au/index.php/2012/02/15/solar-panels-whats-in-a-name/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 14 Feb 2012 23:36:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Solar]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.suncoastsolar.com.au/?p=2135</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[With more and more poor quality solar panels being offered for sale in Australia for very low prices how can consumers know the difference between a good solar panel and a poor one? Our top 5 tips are: 1) Do not rely on what the salesperson tells you &#8211; if they tell you their panels are [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>With more and more poor quality solar panels being offered for sale in Australia for very low prices how can consumers know the difference between a good solar panel and a poor one?</p>
<p>Our top 5 tips are:</p>
<p>1) Do not rely on what the salesperson tells you &#8211; if they tell you their panels are the best ask them for independant proof. REC panels have just been voted No1 performer in Photon magazine tests and are top performers on our own test system</p>
<p>2) Do not be fooled by a name. Some solar panel manufacturers ave brand names that can mislead the consumer for example Canadian Solar Panels are not made in Canada they are Chinese and German Solar Panels are not made in Germany they are also made in China.</p>
<p>3) CEC approved panels means nothing &#8211; it is not a guarantee of quality it simply means that panel has passed a limited number of tests.</p>
<p>4) Ask who stands behind the solar panel warrranty? It is generally the responsibilty of the importer of the panel to provide the warranty for it and as soon as that importer decides to close his or her business you do not have any warranty at all.</p>
<p>All solar panels we sell have full Australian warranty support giving you peice of mind</p>
<p>5) If it sounds too good to be true it is &#8211; don&#8217;t be fooled by very cheap prices you will end up with a poor quality system that won&#8217;t perform well and will inevitably break down</p>
<p>&nbsp;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.suncoastsolar.com.au/index.php/2012/02/15/solar-panels-whats-in-a-name/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Gold Coast Solar Conman flees</title>
		<link>http://www.suncoastsolar.com.au/index.php/2012/02/01/gold-coast-solar-conman-flees/</link>
		<comments>http://www.suncoastsolar.com.au/index.php/2012/02/01/gold-coast-solar-conman-flees/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 31 Jan 2012 22:04:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Solar]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.suncoastsolar.com.au/?p=2112</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The courier mail yesterday reported that Gold Coast Solar Conman Sean Kelly has closed his latest business NEPV leaving hundreds of customers with virtually no hope of receiving installations for which they paid thousands of dollars in deposits. One irate creditor has reportedly hired private detectives to track down Mr Kelly. The BSA has also [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The courier mail yesterday reported that Gold Coast Solar Conman Sean Kelly has closed his latest business NEPV leaving hundreds of customers with virtually no hope of receiving installations for which they paid thousands of dollars in deposits. One irate creditor has reportedly hired private detectives to track down Mr Kelly.</p>
<p>The BSA has also issued a warning to consumers about Mr Kelly and his companies.</p>
<p>The courier mail reported that NEPV owes more than $1million to Chinese panel manufacturers and $1.8m to Gold Coast company Ecovation plus hundreds of thousands to other creditors including installers and the ATO.</p>
<p>The message is clear &#8211; deal with a long standing company you can trust. Sunshine Coast Solar Centre has more than 30 years experience in the solar industry and has been trading from Kayleigh drive for almost 20 years. If you would like a great deal on quality solar then <a href="http://www.suncoastsolar.com.au/index.php/contact-us/">contact us</a> today.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.suncoastsolar.com.au/index.php/2012/02/01/gold-coast-solar-conman-flees/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>US considers import tariff on Chinese Solar Panels</title>
		<link>http://www.suncoastsolar.com.au/index.php/2012/02/01/us-considers-import-tariff-on-chinese-solar-panels/</link>
		<comments>http://www.suncoastsolar.com.au/index.php/2012/02/01/us-considers-import-tariff-on-chinese-solar-panels/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 31 Jan 2012 21:46:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Solar]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.suncoastsolar.com.au/?p=2109</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Weighing Tariffs on Chinese Solar Panels The Commerce Department is scheduled to decide in a month whether Chinese solar panels should be subject to an import tariff, after fielding a complaint from domestic manufacturers that the Chinese are illegally subsidizing their solar export market. The department has not said how it will rule. But on [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<h1>Weighing Tariffs on Chinese Solar Panels</h1>
<address>The Commerce Department is scheduled to decide in a month whether Chinese solar panels should be subject to an import tariff, after fielding a complaint from domestic manufacturers that the Chinese are illegally subsidizing their solar export market. The department has not said how it will rule.</address>
<div>
<p>But on Monday it issued a finding stating that the domestic manufacturers were facing “critical circumstances,” which means that if it does decide to favor imposing duties, they could, in theory, be retroactive to 90 days before its decision.</p>
<p>The domestic manufacturers, led by SolarWorld, an Oregon company, welcomed the statement, saying that the department had taken “expedited action against a massive, evasive surge of Chinese solar cell and panel imports ahead of Commerce’s first preliminary determination on duties.’’</p>
<p>But the department’s finding might not mean that tariffs are imminent or that they will be retroactive, said one trade expert, David M. Spooner, a former assistant secretary for import administration. For the tariffs to apply, he said, a second part of the government, the United States International Trade Commission, must agree, and often it does not.</p>
<p>At SolarWorld, Ben Santarris, a spokesman, said he thought the Commerce Department was “putting importers on notice, that they will be held accountable retroactively for any preliminary duties that are imposed.’’</p>
<p>In fact, importers are now faced with a difficult business situation because they are selling a product whose cost to them might turn out to be double or triple what they paid the Chinese factory.</p>
<p>But the issue is unfair subsidies, which is different from “critical circumstances.” The definition of “critical circumstances” is based on an increase in imports of 15 percent in a three-month period. It is not based on prices, although, of course, competitive prices are probably required to sustain an increase in imports.</p>
<p>The Commerce Department is analyzing charges brought by the domestic manufacturers that China uses 30 different subsidy programs, with names like Funds for Outward Expansion of Industries in Guangdong Province, and Export Guarantees and Insurance for Green Technology.</p>
<p>The Commerce Department did say that it had “reasonable cause to believe or suspect” that the alleged subsidies were “inconsistent” with World Trade Organization rules.</p>
<p>The domestic manufacturers have called for duties of 50 to 250 percent and asked for retroactive duties to block the possibility of a flood of new imports in anticipation of duties. China already holds half the American market.</p>
<p>In other action on Monday, a coalition of companies that sell and install solar panels released a study predicting that the imposition of tariffs could cost the United States about 60,000 jobs in the next few years. According to the study, by the Brattle Group, for each megawatt of new solar capacity installed in this country, there are 30 jobs, but only three of those are in manufacturing.</p>
<p>Jigar Shah, the president of the group, called the Coalition for Affordable Solar Energy, said it would be “devastating for American workers” if the American manufacturers prevailed.</p>
<p>Mark P. Berkman, an economist who was a lead author of the study, said that if the duty was 100 percent, 16,900 to 49,600 jobs could be lost, although he acknowledged that the projection assumed continued rapid growth in the solar business. In any case, he said, “these are not trivial numbers.”</p>
<p>Many of those projected job losses are outside the solar industry, he said. If the prices of solar cells were to rise and people still bought them, they would have less money to spend on everything else and the economy would slow down, according to his analysis.</p>
<p>Solar panels make up about a quarter of the cost of installing a solar system on a home roof and about 40 percent of the cost of a utility-scale system. (Utility systems are more efficient to install, since they do not require separate engineering and design for multiple small systems.)</p>
<p>By Mr. Berkman’s calculation, a 20-megawatt solar system installed by a utility would cost $62.6 million without the duties and $68 million with them.</p>
<p>But the manufacturers’ group said in a statement that there was more to this than the balance of jobs. China, it said, is “breaking U.S. laws and international treaties that the world community has deemed essential to preventing government-sponsored destruction of foreign industries.’’</p>
<p>And if China established a monopoly, the group predicted, it would raise prices later.</p>
</div>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.suncoastsolar.com.au/index.php/2012/02/01/us-considers-import-tariff-on-chinese-solar-panels/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>REC Solar Panels named No1 performer in 2011 Photon Magazine test</title>
		<link>http://www.suncoastsolar.com.au/index.php/2012/01/31/rec-solar-panels-named-no1-performer-in-2011-photon-magazine-test/</link>
		<comments>http://www.suncoastsolar.com.au/index.php/2012/01/31/rec-solar-panels-named-no1-performer-in-2011-photon-magazine-test/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 30 Jan 2012 23:22:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Blog]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Solar]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.suncoastsolar.com.au/?p=2106</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[REC solar modules ranked first in the year long comparative study conducted by Photon Laboratory in 2011 which measures energy yield. On average, REC modules have generated more electricity than 45 other module brands, producing 6 percent more energy. REC multicrystaline modules outperformed 45 different types of modules, including thin film and monocrystaline products. “This [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>REC solar modules ranked first in the year long comparative study conducted by Photon Laboratory in 2011 which measures energy yield. On average, REC modules have generated more electricity than 45 other module brands, producing 6 percent more energy. REC multicrystaline modules outperformed 45 different types of modules, including thin film and monocrystaline products. “This award confirms that REC leads the industry in delivering quality, high-performing modules and demonstrates our commitment to quality and efficiency. This is great news for REC and for our partners and customers”, said Luc Graré, Senior Vice President, Sales and Marketing, Cells and Modules, REC.</p>
<p>The Photon Field Performance Test measures how many kilowatt hours of electricity a module generates throughout one year in real life conditions.  Two modules from each supplier are being tested at the laboratory location in Germany. The results published in the industry magazine Photon Profi state that the highest performance ratio of 90.8 percent and also the highest yield of 1150.4 kWh/kW were measured for the REC module.</p>
<p>The Photon Test is currently the most recognized field performance test, comparing international solar module brands over several years, during different seasons and in different light conditions. Using scientific methodology, the test helps consumers select the best module supplier based on product performance in the field. These results show the excellent bankability of REC modules, as their additional output allows consumers to have a faster return on their investment.</p>
<p>Over the last 24 months, REC modules have maintained a leading position in the Photon Test, ranking second overall in 2010. As the world’s most integrated solar company, REC delivers high performing products by controlling the complete solar value chain with production from silicon to cells, wafers and modules to systems development.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.suncoastsolar.com.au/index.php/2012/01/31/rec-solar-panels-named-no1-performer-in-2011-photon-magazine-test/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Q-Cells struggles to survive</title>
		<link>http://www.suncoastsolar.com.au/index.php/2012/01/30/q-cells-struggles-to-survive/</link>
		<comments>http://www.suncoastsolar.com.au/index.php/2012/01/30/q-cells-struggles-to-survive/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 29 Jan 2012 22:17:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Solar]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.suncoastsolar.com.au/?p=2103</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[A global reduction of government rebates and feed in tariffs for solar power has resulted in a significant decline in the demand for solar panels. German officials recently announced further cuts to their tariffs triggering a slump in the share price of some manufacturers already staggering under the weight of massive debt. Bloomberg and Reuters [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>A global reduction of government rebates and feed in tariffs for solar power has resulted in a significant decline in the demand for solar panels. German officials recently announced further cuts to their tariffs triggering a slump in the share price of some manufacturers already staggering under the weight of massive debt.</p>
<p><a href="http://www.bloomberg.com/news/2012-01-24/q-cells-drops-to-record-amid-financing-struggle-frankfurt-mover.html">Bloomberg</a> and <a href="http://www.reuters.com/article/2012/01/24/qcells-idUSL5E8CO0L020120124">Reuters</a> recently reported that, Q-Cells, a German company manufacturing solar panels in Malaysia, had announced that they may be unable to repay a 202 million euro debt when it becomes due in February. The announcement forced the resignation of the CFO and saw Q-Cells shares plummet to a record low of €0.37 euro cents as investors question whether the company can survive. Q-Cells held a series of crisis talks with creditors after a court decision prevented deferral of the debt repayment.</p>
<p>Conergy faced similar problems in 2010 and has now been taken over by hedge funds. As yet no hedge funds have shown interest in Q-Cells.</p>
<p>Q-Cells has now agreed with bondholders to restructure the debt in return for equity in the company which some sharemarket analysts believe will be a negative for shareholders as it significantly dilutes their holdings. Although the current crisis appears to be over it remains to be seen whether Q-Cells will survive or will join Evergreen Solar, Solar Millenium, Solon and Solyndra LLC in bankruptcy.</p>
<p>It is apparent that the solar manufacturing industry will continue to undergo an intense period of consolidation and only robust companies will survive. REC &#8211; a fully integrated solar panel manufacturer and supplier of raw silicon, wafers and cells to others will be one of the survivors as it has manageable debt levels, a solid balance sheet, strong sales and a proven high quality product, REC solar panels will remain at the forefront of the industry.</p>
<p>Sources: Bloomberg and Reuters</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.suncoastsolar.com.au/index.php/2012/01/30/q-cells-struggles-to-survive/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>REC Solar panels selected for UK&#8217;s largest solar plants</title>
		<link>http://www.suncoastsolar.com.au/index.php/2012/01/17/rec-solar-panels-selected-for-uks-largest-solar-plants/</link>
		<comments>http://www.suncoastsolar.com.au/index.php/2012/01/17/rec-solar-panels-selected-for-uks-largest-solar-plants/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 17 Jan 2012 04:03:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Blog]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Solar]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.suncoastsolar.com.au/?p=2095</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[REC Systems, a business unit of REC, has successfully developed, constructed, financed, sold and received the 25-year feed-in tariff accreditation for the 5MW Durrants solar power plant located on the Isle of Wight, UK. The Durrants solar power plant will produce 5400 MWh of electricity yearly and includes more than 19,000 high performance REC Peak [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>REC Systems, a business unit of REC, has successfully developed, constructed, financed, sold and received the 25-year feed-in tariff accreditation for the 5MW Durrants solar power plant located on the Isle of Wight, UK. The Durrants solar power plant will produce 5400 MWh of electricity yearly and includes more than 19,000 high performance REC Peak Energy modules. The installation will offset 3,500 tons of CO2 per year and provide enough energy to support 1,450 four person homes per year. In addition, REC supplied solar panels to the 5MW for Ebbsfleet solar plant in Kent, UK.</p>
<p>These projects are amongst the largest grid-connected solar power plants in the UK, located in locations with excellent irradiation. They are also among the first PV plants in the UK to receive project financing for the UK feed-in tariff scheme. Given the changes in the FiT, REC had to ensure a quick construction of the Durrants project in order to achieve the completion and connection of the plant to the grid by the July 31 2011 incentive scheme deadline. The successful completion is a result of cooperation between REC Systems, Kronos Solar GmbH who originally developed the Durrants project and Vogt Solar GmbH who were subcontracted to undertake the construction and systems integration. Kronos Solar is a Munich-based project developer with a track record in project development in Europe. Vogt Solar is a Berlin-based system-integrator, who also developed and constructed the Ebbsfleet project.</p>
<p>Both projects were project financed by Bayern LB’s London branch which provided £36 million of debt including portions funded by the German Development Bank (KfW). The Durrants project was sold to a fund managed by Bluefield Partners LLP. Bluefield is a London based fund manager focused on solar and renewable energy investments which will also manage the Durrants project on behalf of its investors. “REC is pleased to work with Kronos, Vogt Solar, Bayern LB and Bluefield to realize this landmark project. Excellent collaboration throughout the development and construction process made it possible to realize this project in a very short period allowing us to effectively manage difficult market conditions. The sudden change in solar policy has brought challenges for large-scale developers in the UK. REC hopes that the government will provide a predictable framework to support the growing solar industry in the country”, said Terje Pilskog, SVP REC Systems.</p>
<p>In Europe REC Systems have offices in Munich, Germany and Milan, Italy, managing the development, design, installation and financing of large scale rooftop and free field projects. During 2011, REC Systems developed and constructed more than 70 MW of PV projects</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.suncoastsolar.com.au/index.php/2012/01/17/rec-solar-panels-selected-for-uks-largest-solar-plants/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>The Hon Greg Combet MP address to the AuSES conference</title>
		<link>http://www.suncoastsolar.com.au/index.php/2011/12/14/the-hon-greg-combet-mp-address-to-the-auses-conference/</link>
		<comments>http://www.suncoastsolar.com.au/index.php/2011/12/14/the-hon-greg-combet-mp-address-to-the-auses-conference/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 13 Dec 2011 23:04:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Solar]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.suncoastsolar.com.au/?p=2070</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The Hon Greg Combet MP recently addressed a conference hosted by AuSES and confirmed his support to both large and small scale solar installations. &#160; &#160;]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The Hon Greg Combet MP recently addressed a conference hosted by AuSES and confirmed his support to both large and small scale solar installations.</p>
<p><iframe width="500" height="281" src="http://www.youtube.com/embed/Roqn2erOGvw?fs=1&#038;feature=oembed" frameborder="0" allowfullscreen></iframe></p>
<p>&nbsp;</p>
<p>&nbsp;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.suncoastsolar.com.au/index.php/2011/12/14/the-hon-greg-combet-mp-address-to-the-auses-conference/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Queensland Electricity prices to soar by 42%</title>
		<link>http://www.suncoastsolar.com.au/index.php/2011/12/12/queensland-electricity-prices-to-soar-by-42/</link>
		<comments>http://www.suncoastsolar.com.au/index.php/2011/12/12/queensland-electricity-prices-to-soar-by-42/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 12 Dec 2011 04:42:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Solar]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.suncoastsolar.com.au/?p=2062</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The following news article from the Australian once again incorrectly and unfairly points the finger at rooftop solar for massive forecast increases in electricity prices. The actual impact on pricing by roofop solar is minimal with the bulk of the predicted increases coming from necessary infrastructure upgrades &#8211; according to a recent report from the Australian [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The following news article from the Australian once again incorrectly and unfairly points the finger at rooftop solar for massive forecast increases in electricity prices. The actual impact on pricing by roofop solar is minimal with the bulk of the predicted increases coming from necessary infrastructure upgrades &#8211; according to a recent <a href="http://www.aemc.gov.au/Media/docs/Information%20sheet-b6ea33d3-73c8-4e89-b767-d619f3149d3e-1.PDF" target="_blank">report </a>from the Australian Energy Market Commission the predicted increases in prices are due to</p>
<p>Wholesale: 40.2%<br />
Distribution: 33.6%<br />
Retail: 12.1%<br />
Transmission: 6.0%<br />
LRET (Large Scale Renewable Energy Target: 3.8%<br />
Feed-in tariff: 2.8%<br />
SRES (Small Scale Renewable Energy Scheme):  -0.8%<br />
Other state based schemes: 2.3%</p>
<p>If you want to protect yourself from these massive price increases then <a href="http://www.suncoastsolar.com.au/index.php/contact-us/" target="_blank">contact us</a> today for an obligation free quote.</p>
<p>&nbsp;</p>
<p>From the Australian</p>
<p>THE federal scheme to promote the installation of rooftop solar panels and hot-water systems will have a cumulative cost to consumers of $4.7 billion by mid-2020, adding to pressure on household power bills. <!-- google_ad_section_end(name=story_introduction) --><!-- // .story-intro --><!-- google_ad_section_start(name=story_body, weight=high) --></p>
<p>The prediction is contained in advice to the nation&#8217;s energy ministers, which also forecasts rises in residential electricity prices of about 37 per cent in the three years to 2013-14, with an average annual hike of 11 per cent.</p>
<p>The predicted rise shows prices may increase faster than previously expected, with predictions in July suggesting the three-year rise was expected to be in the order of 30 per cent.</p>
<p>The advice also shows that the carbon tax is likely to hit electricity prices hardest in Queensland and NSW, where power prices are tipped to rise by 42 per cent over the next three years &#8211; compared with a 32 per cent rise without a carbon price.</p>
<p>This is broadly in line with Treasury modelling, which suggests that the carbon tax will add about 10 per cent to power prices from 2013-17.</p>
<div><!-- [Group:1226160316284] on [fwprodcontent05.ni.news.com.au] @ [December 12, 2011 3:26PM] --></p>
<div>
<div>
<div><!-- promo-image-01 --></p>
<div>
<div><!-- promo-image-a --></p>
<div>
<div><strong>Queensland, NSW and the ACT faced the highest predicted price rises over the next three years, at 42 per cent.</strong></div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
<p>They are followed by South Australia, with a predicted rise of 36 per cent; Victoria (33 per cent), Western Australia (30 per cent), Tasmania (25 per cent); and the Northern Territory (16 per cent).</p>
<p>The reports, by the Australian Energy Market Commission, were released by the Ministerial Standing Council on Energy and Resources.</p>
<p>After the meeting, federal Resources Minister Martin Ferguson announced a Productivity Commission inquiry into aspects of electricity network regulation.</p>
<p>Mr Ferguson said that significant investment was required in electricity networks to replace and upgrade ageing assets, to meet growing levels of demand and facilitate a transition towards clean-energy technologies.</p>
<p>&#8220;Critical to delivering our energy needs is ensuring that our network regulatory frameworks are delivering efficient and reliable outcomes for consumers,&#8221; Mr Ferguson said.</p>
<p>But the energy network businesses hit back, saying network prices had to rise to ensure safe electricity supplies to consumers and because the costs of raising funds offshore was increasing.</p>
<p>The AEMC reports found that on top of the $4.7 billion from small-scale renewable projects, energy consumers would also pay for the costs of state-based feed-in tariffs for households for injecting power back into the grid over the life of systems that have already been installed.</p>
<p>The AEMC found if the states adhered to caps on feed-in tariffs &#8211; which several states are imposing in an attempt to rein in generous rebates &#8211; then the take-up of the small-scale renewable energy scheme should fall from existing levels.</p>
<p>&#8220;But forecasts of higher retail electricity prices and reductions in the technology costs for solar PV will still provide incentives for some consumers to take up the SRES,&#8221; the AEMC found.</p>
<p>As the SRES is a national scheme, decisions by state governments on their feed-in tariffs hit all consumers, as retailers are required to buy certificates that are then &#8220;passed through to all consumers in Australia&#8221;.</p>
<p>By the middle of this year, about 400,000 households had PV solar systems installed.</p>
<p>The number of solar rooftop panel installations could reach more than 1.5 million by 2019-20 &#8211; accounting for more than one in every four owner-occupied households &#8211; if a carbon price starts next year.</p>
<p>The main beneficiaries of the green policy have been people living in houses and semi-detached homes in suburbs with low population densities, young children and often have three cars to a dwelling. By contrast, young people, those renting, the very affluent and people in higher population density areas were unlikely to tap the scheme.</p>
<p>The majority of the new solar installations were expected in NSW and Queensland, with a significant number in Victoria and Western Australia.</p>
<p>&nbsp;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.suncoastsolar.com.au/index.php/2011/12/12/queensland-electricity-prices-to-soar-by-42/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Top 10 Solar Suburbs</title>
		<link>http://www.suncoastsolar.com.au/index.php/2011/12/09/top-10-solar-suburbs/</link>
		<comments>http://www.suncoastsolar.com.au/index.php/2011/12/09/top-10-solar-suburbs/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 09 Dec 2011 04:33:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Blog]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Solar]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.suncoastsolar.com.au/?p=2059</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[According to data recently published by the Office of Renewable Energy Regulator the following are the top 10 solar power suburbs in Australia (based on the number of installations). The top spot has been taken by Mandurah in WA with Currimundi / Caloundra in the No2 spot and Buderim 8th. Although QLD has 6 of the [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>According to data recently published by the Office of Renewable Energy Regulator the following are the top 10 solar power suburbs in Australia (based on the number of installations). The top spot has been taken by Mandurah in WA with Currimundi / Caloundra in the No2 spot and Buderim 8th. Although QLD has 6 of the top 10 suburbs, the state with the most solar power systems installed compared to the number of electricity customers is South Australia with QLD 2nd followed in order by WA, ACT, NSW, VIC, TAS and NT.</p>
<table style="width: 356px;" border="0" cellspacing="0" cellpadding="0">
<colgroup>
<col width="64" /></colgroup>
<colgroup>
<col span="2" width="146" /></colgroup>
<tbody>
<tr>
<td width="64" height="17">Postcode</td>
<td width="146">No of Solar Installations</td>
<td width="146"></td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td width="64" height="17">6210</td>
<td width="146">3,643</td>
<td>Mandurah WA</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td width="64" height="17">4551</td>
<td width="146">3,184</td>
<td>Currimundi QLD</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td width="64" height="17">2830</td>
<td width="146">3,141</td>
<td>Dubbo NSW</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td width="64" height="17">4655</td>
<td width="146">3,036</td>
<td>Hervey Bay QLD</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td width="64" height="17">4670</td>
<td width="146">2,740</td>
<td>Bundaberg QLD</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td width="64" height="17">2480</td>
<td width="146">2,470</td>
<td>Lismore NSW</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td width="64" height="17">6155</td>
<td width="146">2,316</td>
<td>Canning Vale WA</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td width="64" height="17">4556</td>
<td width="146">2,235</td>
<td>Buderim QLD</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td width="64" height="17">4350</td>
<td width="146">2,208</td>
<td>Centenary Heights QLD</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td width="64" height="17">4211</td>
<td width="146">2,138</td>
<td>BeechMont QLD</td>
</tr>
</tbody>
</table>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.suncoastsolar.com.au/index.php/2011/12/09/top-10-solar-suburbs/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>We have moved &#8230;..</title>
		<link>http://www.suncoastsolar.com.au/index.php/2011/12/05/we-are-moving/</link>
		<comments>http://www.suncoastsolar.com.au/index.php/2011/12/05/we-are-moving/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 04 Dec 2011 22:40:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Blog]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Solar]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.suncoastsolar.com.au/?p=2050</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[After 15 years in the same building in Kayleigh Drive, Maroochydore Sunshine Coast Solar Centre has relocated to new, larger premises. We aren&#8217;t however moving very far, our new home with much improved showroom is at number 38 Kayleigh Drive, Maroochydore which is situated on the corner of Kelly Court and Kayleigh Drive. Sunshine Coast Solar [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>After 15 years in the same building in Kayleigh Drive, Maroochydore Sunshine Coast Solar Centre has relocated to new, larger premises. We aren&#8217;t however moving very far, our new home with much improved showroom is at number 38 Kayleigh Drive, Maroochydore which is situated on the corner of Kelly Court and Kayleigh Drive.</p>
<p>Sunshine Coast Solar Centre Director, Brian Fawcett said today that the move would allow us to offer a greatly expanded range of solar options for our clients including installation of solar on caravans and RV&#8217;s.</p>
<p>&nbsp;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.suncoastsolar.com.au/index.php/2011/12/05/we-are-moving/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

